Navigation auf uzh.ch
Navigation auf uzh.ch
Durch Klick auf die einzelnen Themen werden die Detail-Informationen angezeigt.
| Themenvergabe online über Teams (Einladung folgt) am 19. September 2023 12:30-13:30 |
offen:
Beschreibung: Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression-management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 281?297. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.379
Bourdage, J. S., Schmidt, J., Wiltshire, J., Nguyen, B., & Lee, K. (2020). Personality, interview performance, and the mediating role of impression management. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 93(3), 556?577. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12304
Brouer, R. L., Gallagher, V. C., & Badawy, R. L. (2016). Ability to manage resources in the impression management process: The mediating effects of resources on job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(4), 515?531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9426-5
Kontakt: Anna Luca Heimann, E-Mail
Beschreibung: Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Voelpel, S. C., & van Vugt, M. (2019). It?s not just what is said, but when it?s said: A temporal account of verbal behaviors and emergent leadership in self-managed teams. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 717?738. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0149
Meyer, B., Burtscher, M. J., Jonas, K., Feese, S., Arnrich, B., Tröster, G., & Schermuly, C. C. (2016). What good leaders actually do: Micro-level leadership behaviour, leader evaluations, and team decision quality. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(6), 773?789. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2016.1189903
Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2018). We can do it! Inclusive leader language promotes voice behavior in multi-professional teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(3), 389?402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.09.002
Kontakt: Anna Luca Heimann, E-Mail
Beschreibung: Interaktionskodierung gewinnt in der Führungsforschung zunehmend an Aufmerksamkeit, da sie eine Methode zur Erfassung von beobachtbarem Führungsverhaltens und Alternativ zur üblichen Verwendung von Fragebögen darstellt. Obwohl die Interaktionskodierung viele Vorteile bietet, ist es notwendig, sich damit zu befassen, ob und inwiefern diese Methode den Qualitätskriterien von Validität, Reliabilität, und Objektivität standhält.
Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Allen, J. A. (2018). Modeling temporal interaction dynamics in organizational settings. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(3), 325?344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9506-9
Meinecke, A. L., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Kauffeld, S. (2017). What happens during annual appraisal interviews? How leader-follower interactions unfold and impact interview outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(7), 1054?1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000219
Kontakt: Amelie Güntner, E-Mail
Beschreibung: Feiler, A. R., & Powell, D. M. (2016). The role of self?focused attention and negative self?thought in interview anxiety: A test of two interventions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(2), 132?149. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12136
Maurer, T. J., Solamon, J. M., & Lippstreu, M. (2008). How does coaching interviewees affect the validity of a structured interview? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(3), 355?371. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.512
Wirantana, V., Stocco, C. S., & Kohn, C. S. (2020). The implementation and adoptability of behavioral skills training in a university career center. Behavioral Interventions, 35(1), 84?98. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1692
Kontakt: Anna Luca Heimann, E-Mail
Beschreibung: Startquelle: Breuer, C., Hüffmeier, J., & Hertel, G. (2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1151?1177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/apl0000113
Kontakt: Annika Wilhelmy, E-Mail
vergeben:
