Header

Suche
Psychologisches Institut Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Prüfungsliteratur

Prüfungsliteratur Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie

Das Ziel der Masterprüfung ist es, verschiedene Themenbereiche der Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie zu diskutieren, um die Fähigkeit der Studierenden zu prüfen, (i) theoretische Ansätze und Modelle zu erläutern und voneinander zu unterscheiden, (ii) Studiendesigns kritisch zu diskutieren, (iii) Verbindungen zwischen verschiedenen Themenbereichen herzustellen und (iv) Anwendungsmöglichkeiten aufzuzeigen.

Ablauf: Die Studierenden können einen Artikel als Einstiegsthema wählen und diesen in den ersten 5 Minuten vorstellen. In den restlichen 25 Minuten werden Fragen zu Artikeln aus allen Themenbereichen gestellt.

Unterlagen wie Artikel oder eigene Notizen dürfen während der Prüfung genutzt werden. Die Prüfung kann auf Deutsch oder, falls gewünscht, auf Englisch durchgeführt werden.

  • Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work-family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091330
  • Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  • Barrick, M. R., & Parks-Leduc, L. (2019). Selection for fit. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015028
  • Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Carter, K. M., & Mount, M. K. (2017). Are smarter people happier? Meta-analyses of the relationships between general mental ability and job and life satisfaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 99, 146-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.01.003
  • Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108
  • Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
  • Greenberg, J. (1990a). Employee theft as a reaction to underpayment inequity: The hidden cost of pay cuts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.561
  • Hall, D. T., Yip, J., & Doiron, K. (2018). Protean careers at work: Self-direction and values orientation in psychological success. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 129-156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104631
  • Heine, E. C. E., Stouten, J., & Liden, R. C. (2026). Performance feedback: A critical systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 47, 312-361. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.70033
  • Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person-situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the Big Five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149-1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837
  • Kanfer, R., Frese, M., & Johnson, R. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338-355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133
  • Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763
  • Meier, L. L., Keller, A. C., Reis, D., & Nohe, C. (2023). On the asymmetry of losses and gains: Implications of changing work conditions for well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(8), 1408-1424. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001080
  • Rudolph, C. W., Shoss, M. K., & Zacher, H. (2025). Dynamic and reciprocal relations between job insecurity and physical and mental health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 110(7), 948-962. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001259
  • Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M., & Lievens, F. (2022). Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040-2068. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000994
  • Sayre, G. M., & Conroy, S. A. (2024). The other side of the coin: An integrative review connecting pay and health. Journal of Applied Psychology, 109(8), 1178-1203. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001151
  • Spector, P. E., Zapf, D., Chen, P. Y., & Frese, M. (2000). Why negative affectivity should not be controlled in job stress research: Do not throw out the baby with the bath water. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 79-95.
  • Yuan, Z., Yin, J., & Sun, J. (2026). The paradox of team conflict revisited: An updated meta-analysis of the team conflict-team performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 111(2), 195-224. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001315
  • Wu, W., Liu, W., Wu, W., & Xia, Y. (2026). Off to a hard start: How job rotation reshapes newcomers’ learning and adjustment process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 111(2), 262-279. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0001312
  • Zacher, H. (2022). Metatheories in work, organizational, and business psychology. In H. Zacher & N. Lehmann-Willenbrock (Eds.), Work, organizational, and business psychology: An introductory textbook (pp. 26-41). W. Kohlhammer.

Stand: 12. Februar 2025